forum: Leftovers
#1 Mon 20 Aug 12 12:38am
CatyL
- Member Occupation Free Lance Editor
- From San Francisco CA
- Member since Mon 26 Apr 10
Slow-Cooker "Aha!" Moment
4-5 years ago, at the urging of several friends, I bought a slow cooker. Overall, I've been less than enthusiastic about it. Most things have seemed overcooked, even when I lessen the suggested cooking time. Dishes seemed "sloppy," for lack of a better word.
Recipes call for outrageous cooking times, and enormous amonts of liquid. "...to cover the meat...," isn't unusual.
(I'd, likely, have given it to a trift shop, were it not for the wonderful crockery pot insert, with which I won't part.)
Yesterday, I bought a whole chicken at a very good price. On the web, I found a slow-cooker recipe that "Ta Da!," specified NO added liquid. (YES!!)
I mixed spices of choice, placed the "spicy" bird atop a bed of coarsely chopped onion/garlic, (I decided to prop lemon slices between the bird and the pot), and let 'er go on "high," for 4-5 hours.
It's been cooking for 2 hours. The aroma is just beginning to rise. And, my chicken is holding it's shape ... NOT sinking into a watery abyss.
I don't know why it hadn't occurred to me, before, to cut that drowning nonsense. There's plenty of moisture in the onion/garlic/lemon/WHOLE CHICKEN, to accommodate the cooking process. Moreover, I've been using the terra cotta/clay-pot cooker, for decades. With that method, everything goes (raw) into the cooker, with small amounts of liquid ... if any.
This recipe also suggests that the chicken be de-boned, after dinner, and that the carcass/veggies/water, be set for a long, slow cook toward a glorious stock.
Mmmmmm.
Offline
#2 Mon 20 Aug 12 1:07am
JoyYamDaisy

- From Melbourne Australia
- Member since Sun 12 Apr 09
Re: Slow-Cooker "Aha!" Moment
Brilliant Catyl! And mouthwatering! ![]()
Offline
#3 Mon 20 Aug 12 1:59am
Luvmegrub
Occupation Cleaner at The Salmon Arms
- From Sydney, Australia
- Member since Fri 22 Aug 08
Re: Slow-Cooker "Aha!" Moment
Were you happy with the end result Caty?
I've done pork and beef this way, just on a bed of onions & garlic with herbs or marinade over the meat. You still end up with liquid in the slowcooker even if you don't add any at the beginning. I also cut out a lot of the recommended liquid when doing stews/casserole type dishes, maybe adding tinned tomatoes and veg. That way you don't end up with litres of left-over liquid that you throw away.
Offline
#4 Mon 20 Aug 12 11:44pm
mummza
Occupation avoiding housework
- From The land of song.
- Member since Tue 04 Oct 05
Re: Slow-Cooker "Aha!" Moment
I love using the slow cooker and it comes into its own in the winter.... especially when the family are all home and they go off clubbing with their friends , it is then that I make sure I put it on ready for their retern in the early/not so early hours of the morning .
A hot meal after a hard nights dancing in the clubs is alays appreciated , but the draw back is that the friends also love this as well and come along for some hot food on their way home so the house sometimes gets a bit noisy !![]()
I have never put much liquid into the slow cooker unless I was heating a pot of soup ( useful to do this at Christmas time when space on the hob is limited !)
Like cooking with a tagine, any fluid that evaporates from the cooking food gets caught and condenses back into the pot . This is why I add not much liquid when cooking in the slow cooker , I definatly do not cover the meat or what ever else is cooking with fluid.
I am not good at following recipes dispite having hundreds of cook books that I read and this is partly why I nver put much fluid into the slowcooker.
When my darling uses the slow cooker he adds ore fluid than I do and then he removes the liquid to thicken it in a pan on the stove top. I never do that , if I want the juices to thicken I simply dust the meat being used with plain flour after I have browned it but before I add it to the slow cooker.
Another use for the slow cooker is to cook the christmas pudding .
I had a freind who used to do this and it works very well.
My show cooker has a rack that fits in the base of the dish , this allows meat to be 'roasted' or potatoes to be 'baked ' . I have never tried this but ought to give it a try smetime I think.
Offline
#5 Tue 21 Aug 12 7:25am
dhartley
- Member Occupation Office Wallah
- From Yorkshire / E Sussex
- Member since Thu 15 Mar 12
Re: Slow-Cooker "Aha!" Moment
I find mine useful for making chicken stock in as it seems to eke all the flavour out of the chicken and veg without the veg breaking down like it does when you simmer it. Much clearer stock and more flavour I think.
Offline